|
Post by drchan on Apr 23, 2022 20:01:29 GMT -5
Then don't bother stressing it's 2002 if it isn't going to be an essential part of the movie. Being a period piece can add to the movie's world building. But if it's not going to commit to it, don't bother bringing it up. Why does LITERALLY everyone keep Ignoring the suggestion of the movie taking place in an ALTERNATE Timeline where 9/11 never happened?!So can movies taking place in the 1940s where WW2 never happened. Doesn't make his argument any less valid.
|
|
|
Post by drchan on Apr 23, 2022 20:03:12 GMT -5
On a side note, I really think Enter should make a response video addressing the controversy and make clarifications. I don't want this to make a bad turn. It's too late; the Damage is already done! So what? It's gives him the chance to make his case known and maybe spark a helpful discussion instead of a dogpile.
|
|
|
Post by angelonius on Apr 24, 2022 11:39:21 GMT -5
That's exactly what he was saying, but people took it as "I hate this movie because it doesn't reference 9/11." It Doesn't fit the Tone of the Movie; So Why Even Add 9/11 into a Film that Doesn't NEED it referenced at all? and Besides; For All We know about The Turning Red Timeline; Perhaps, as I KEEP Pointing out: in THIS Universe's version of 2002; 9/11 Probably didn't even happen!!For that to work, we need to be shown this. Otherwise, we'll just end up something like how the Crystal Gems in Steven Universe are useless against evil events that are done by people.
|
|
|
Post by angelonius on Apr 24, 2022 11:40:05 GMT -5
It Doesn't fit the Tone of the Movie; So Why Even Add 9/11 into a Film that Doesn't NEED it referenced at all? and Besides; For All We know about The Turning Red Timeline; Perhaps, as I KEEP Pointing out: in THIS Universe's version of 2002; 9/11 Probably didn't even happen!!Then don't bother stressing it's 2002 if it isn't going to be an essential part of the movie. Being a period piece can add to the movie's world building. But if it's not going to commit to it, don't bother bringing it up. Blame Domee Shi for that one.
|
|
|
Post by becousinpoetater on Apr 24, 2022 15:42:40 GMT -5
It Doesn't fit the Tone of the Movie; So Why Even Add 9/11 into a Film that Doesn't NEED it referenced at all? and Besides; For All We know about The Turning Red Timeline; Perhaps, as I KEEP Pointing out: in THIS Universe's version of 2002; 9/11 Probably didn't even happen!!For that to work, we need to be shown this. Otherwise, we'll just end up something like how the Crystal Gems in Steven Universe are useless against evil events that are done by people. Isn't the fact that That Universe's Timeline for 2002 looks Drastically Different enough from IRL 2002 to make an inference that 9/11 never happened in this universe?!
|
|
|
Post by angelonius on Apr 25, 2022 3:51:22 GMT -5
For that to work, we need to be shown this. Otherwise, we'll just end up something like how the Crystal Gems in Steven Universe are useless against evil events that are done by people. Isn't the fact that That Universe's Timeline for 2002 looks Drastically Different enough from IRL 2002 to make an inference that 9/11 never happened in this universe?! This could work if Domee Shi decided not to say that her movie takes place in 2002's Toronto. If the movie is set in a vague time/place/both vague time and place, then we would never have this issue to begin with. If anyone wants to see Toronto done right in terms of presentation, I do recommend the Martin Mystery episode called "Mark of the Shapeshifter" as that one managed to do justice to Toronto's aesthetic in the early 2000's. And, since Martin Mystery was set in a vague non-descript time (much like Totally Spies, The Amazing Spiez, LoliRock and Team Galaxy), then depicting Toronto in that episode was done well.
|
|
|
Post by splashtraveler on Feb 26, 2023 16:19:27 GMT -5
I know that this thread is like 10 months old from when I post this comment. But I want to let you know that I wholeheartedly agree with the top post. Even if I had never seen Turning Red.
Also on DeviantArt, there is also backlash on Mr. Enter for his Turning Red take. I might make a separate thread for them in the future. General Johnny Ree’s (aka MegadoopTV) videos on Mr. Enter being overhated and even he thinking that the Turning Red Controversy is stupid; are now privated (I learned that in his newest video that just came up today, it’s because he doesn’t want those videos anymore where he acts like a troll and he is more interested in livestreams).
Overall the Mr. Enter Turning Red 9/11 controversy is stupid, tiring, cringy and is just ruthless, nasty and villainises Mr. Enter for a stupid reason.
Edit June 7, 2023: Hi I did eventually see Mr. Enter’s original Turning Red review. It was okay. While I haven’t seen his new Turning Red review yet.
|
|
|
Post by board3659 on Feb 28, 2023 18:00:04 GMT -5
I know that this thread is like 10 months old from when I post this comment. But I want to let you know that I wholeheartedly agree with the top post. Even if I had never seen Turning Red or Mr. Enter’s review of that movie (I at least seen clips of it from other videos). Also on DeviantArt, there is also backlash on Mr. Enter for his Turning Red take. I might make a separate thread for them in the future. General Johnny Ree’s (aka MegadoopTV) videos on Mr. Enter being overhated and even he thinking that the Turning Red Controversy is stupid; are now privated (I learned that in his newest video that just came up today, it’s because he doesn’t want those videos anymore where he acts like a troll and he is more interested in livestreams). Overall the Mr. Enter Turning Red 9/11 controversy is stupid, retarded (don’t care that I said that word), tiring, cringy and is just ruthless, nasty and villainises Mr. Enter for a stupid reason. I agree. When people are reacting to his video just b/c of a small mistake (Electric Dragon did despite him making stupid takes throughout his Career)
|
|
|
Post by splashtraveler on Mar 8, 2023 3:56:53 GMT -5
I know that this thread is like 10 months old from when I post this comment. But I want to let you know that I wholeheartedly agree with the top post. Even if I had never seen Turning Red or Mr. Enter’s review of that movie (I at least seen clips of it from other videos).Also on DeviantArt, there is also backlash on Mr. Enter for his Turning Red take. I might make a separate thread for them in the future. General Johnny Ree’s (aka MegadoopTV) videos on Mr. Enter being overhated and even he thinking that the Turning Red Controversy is stupid; are now privated (I learned that in his newest video that just came up today, it’s because he doesn’t want those videos anymore where he acts like a troll and he is more interested in livestreams). Overall the Mr. Enter Turning Red 9/11 controversy is stupid, retarded (don’t care that I said that word), tiring, cringy and is just ruthless, nasty and villainises Mr. Enter for a stupid reason. I agree. When people are reacting to his video just b/c of a small mistake (Electric Dragon did despite him making stupid takes throughout his Career) Electric Dragon aka Animat505 was such a hypocrite for his tweet regarding Mr. Enter’s take on Turning Red and 9/11. When he said worser things then that take, you can just watch That Yozzy Bloke’s (Yoshi Player) videos on Animat505. This is coming from someone who used to be a big fan of him, I am still subscribed to him on Youtube and follow him on other websites. I don’t hate him or his videos, but his videos are no longer my favourites anymore. It’s just that now when I post this, I think they are better reviewers then him, ex: Schafrillas Productions, RebelTaxi and Mr. Enter (even from how much hate Mr. Enter gets).
|
|
|
Post by becousinpoetater on Mar 26, 2023 17:44:10 GMT -5
Isn't the fact that That Universe's Timeline for 2002 looks Drastically Different enough from IRL 2002 to make an inference that 9/11 never happened in this universe?! This could work if Domee Shi decided not to say that her movie takes place in 2002's Toronto. If the movie is set in a vague time/place/both vague time and place, then we would never have this issue to begin with. If anyone wants to see Toronto done right in terms of presentation, I do recommend the Martin Mystery episode called "Mark of the Shapeshifter" as that one managed to do justice to Toronto's aesthetic in the early 2000's. And, since Martin Mystery was set in a vague non-descript time (much like Totally Spies, The Amazing Spiez, LoliRock and Team Galaxy), then depicting Toronto in that episode was done well. Just because it takes place in 2002 Toronto; Doesn't mean The Movie's 2002 is the same as OUR 2002; after all as I keep re-iterating; it's an alternate timeline where 9/11 never happenedthe Fact that 9/11 isn't mentioned at ALL in this movie; should be enough evidence to say that in this movie's timeline; 9/11 NEVER happened! Even if it's stated as 2002; the movie doesn't HAVE to be One-to-one with Real Life Events & Timelines!! Besides; Turning red is NOT about 9/11, nor should it be!
|
|
|
Post by splashtraveler on Apr 6, 2024 20:46:19 GMT -5
I know that this thread is like 10 months old from when I post this comment. But I want to let you know that I wholeheartedly agree with the top post. Even if I had never seen Turning Red or Mr. Enter’s review of that movie (I at least seen clips of it from other videos). Also on DeviantArt, there is also backlash on Mr. Enter for his Turning Red take. I might make a separate thread for them in the future. General Johnny Ree’s (aka MegadoopTV) videos on Mr. Enter being overhated and even he thinking that the Turning Red Controversy is stupid; are now privated (I learned that in his newest video that just came up today, it’s because he doesn’t want those videos anymore where he acts like a troll and he is more interested in livestreams). Overall the Mr. Enter Turning Red 9/11 controversy is stupid, retarded (don’t care that I said that word), tiring, cringy and is just ruthless, nasty and villainises Mr. Enter for a stupid reason. I agree. When people are reacting to his video just b/c of a small mistake (Electric Dragon did despite him making stupid takes throughout his Career) Edit April 8, 2024: There is a reason why I edited myself out of saying the R word on my previous comment, even if it’s still there used as a reply. I was young, the R word on the internet I was on was normalized and I wasn’t aware of how bad it was. Now I know that it’s an ableist slur, to anyone who read my comment and have autism, have any other mental disorder or are offended. I’m sorry and will not use that word as an insult or towards unwanted people. Edit April 26, 2024: The rest of the comment is fine. Although at least they are some funny memes, jokes and artwork around it, from people who just see it as a bad take.
|
|